{"id":290,"date":"2007-04-01T23:00:33","date_gmt":"2007-04-01T17:30:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.wokay.in\/2007\/04\/01\/why-dowry-is-a-good-thing\/"},"modified":"2007-04-01T23:00:33","modified_gmt":"2007-04-01T17:30:33","slug":"why-dowry-is-a-good-thing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aadisht.net\/blog\/2007\/04\/01\/why-dowry-is-a-good-thing\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Dowry is a Good Thing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I started the dowry series with two personal anecdotes. now here&#8217;s another one.<\/p>\n<p>Years before <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wokay.in\/2007\/01\/17\/guru\/\">Gurubhai<\/a> was marrying for money, my grandfather&#8217;s sister-in-law was mortgaging her jewllery to finance his apprenticeship in a shop. Without the apprenticeship, my grandfather would have been a tailor. With it, he eventually got his own shop, became an Exide sitributor, and broke into the middle class- which allowed him and his family to escape from Partition alive. If it hadn&#8217;t been for my great-aunt&#8217;s dowry, I probably wouldn&#8217;t be writing this today.<\/p>\n<p>This is the good side of dowry: it transfers wealth from people who have it to people who don&#8217;t. This wealth is especially useful to people who need to break from lower class to middle class and won&#8217;t get any help from banks to do so. It also gives parents an option to give their daughters an inheritance without having to use a will- which is of no small importance in a country where legal documents can be disputed to such brutal effect.<\/p>\n<p>So here&#8217;s a reality check. Dowry has negative connotations. It is associated with forced marriage and a lack of modernity. It has been attacked by everyone from Munshi Premchand to 1980s Doordarshan propaganda filmmakers. It <em>still<\/em> serves a useful purpose.<\/p>\n<p>But what about the bad stuff I&#8217;ve already talked about? The dowry deaths? The unreasonable demands to in-laws? A dowry death is a murder, and needs to be treated as one. The crime is murder, not taking dowry. Similarly, if you have a problem with in-laws being harassed for bigger dowries, treat it as criminal extortion and don&#8217;t criminalise dowry. Dowry is value-neutral. As <a href=\"http:\/\/skthewimp.livejournal.com\/105192.html\">Skimpy points out here<\/a>, it&#8217;s no business of the state &#8211; or anybody else- what two families do by way of voluntary wealth transfers. It become&#8217;s the state&#8217;s business only when physical coercion or intimidation are involved.<\/p>\n<p>Another point. Even assuming dowry bans are successfully enforced, it could end up being a net loss. It would end the high profile, heartstring-tugging, heart-bleeding stories\u00a0 of dowry deaths and destitute girls&#8217; parents, but it would also end up preventing parents from giving their daughters an inheritance without having to die first, and from entrepreneurial sons-in-law getting cheap venture capital. Compare <a href=\"http:\/\/www.econlib.org\/library\/Bastiat\/basEss1.html\">Bastiat&#8217;s essay on the Seen and the Unseen<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Dowry isn&#8217;t perfect, but it isn&#8217;t evil either, any more than high school exams are evil because they lead some students to commit suicide. It could work better, sure, and I&#8217;ll discuss how in the next (and final) post of this series. But it&#8217;s still a useful tool, and needs to be appreciated as that- a tool, nothing more and nothing less.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I started the dowry series with two personal anecdotes. now here&#8217;s another one. Years before Gurubhai was marrying for money, my grandfather&#8217;s sister-in-law was mortgaging her jewllery to finance his apprenticeship in a shop. Without the apprenticeship, my grandfather would have been a tailor. With it, he eventually got his own shop, became an Exide [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[59,40],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-290","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dowry","category-society"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7AOU2-4G","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aadisht.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/290","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aadisht.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aadisht.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aadisht.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aadisht.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=290"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.aadisht.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/290\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aadisht.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=290"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aadisht.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=290"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aadisht.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=290"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}