Sohrabbudin and the Idiotarians

July 13, 2007

What is it about the Sohrabbudin encounter killing that brought out idiotarians from all sides?

First, we had Swapan Dasgupta, who claimed in the Pioneer that Sohrabbudin was just collateral damage in the fight against terrorism:

The conflict between robust anti-terrorism and cynical politics is at the heart of arrest of DG Vanzara and two other IPS officers on charges of killing Sohrabuddin Sheikh, a known extortionist and gun-runner, and his partner in a “false encounter”.

Exactly how does summarily executing an extortionist count as robust anti-terrorism? And if he does have terrorist ties, is arresting him and bringing him to trial not robust enough? (Actually, it isn’t – but that’s an argument for improving judicial processes and police reforms, not encounter killings).

Swapan Dasgupta then pulled an unrelated analogy out with the 7 July bombings:

Two years ago, the British police erred in gunning down an innocent Brazilian in London. Did that lead to the demand for the interrogation and arrest of the Home Secretary and the Prime Minister?

Well, no. But then are the British police subject to the level of political control and/ or interference that the Indian police are? If the political leadership isn’t willing to give the police autonomy, then it should damn well take the responsibility.

The whole column stank of non sequitur, really. Dasgupta kept bringing in a counter terrorism angle (when there was none), and pushed a ‘you can’t have an omelette without breaking eggs’ line. Contrast that to Ramesh Ramanathan’s column in Mint, where he actually pointed out possible police reforms that would free the police to conduct real counter-terrorist operations free of political interference:

The clock on this police reform is ticking. States were required to adhere to the Supreme Court’s directive by January 2007; this has been extended to 31 March 2007. In the coming months, we will see an independent police force for the first time in this country. With it, less opportunity for police misconduct. Lower probability of another Sohrabuddin fake encounter. Fewer moral cul-de-sacs for people to get trapped in.

(Okay, it remains to be seen if the structural changes will actually lead to independence and probity, but at least it’s a start. And at least Ramanathan talks about solutions instead of going off and ranting the way Dasgupta does.)

But wait, that’s not it. From the other end of the ideological spectrum, we got this stunning blogpost on Kafila. Which claimed that all encounter killings in the country were the handiwork of a conspiracy in the Intelligence Bureau. And this is because:

The question is not whether Mr. Modi sanctioned or did not sanction the killings (even presuming that he did), or whether Sohrabuddin was killed on the request of ‘Rajasthani Marble Traders’. The question is, how could the Gujarat police (even if we assume that it acted under orders solely emanating from Modi’s home ministry in Gujarat, or from the Rajasthani Marble Trade) successfully undertake an operation that needed to be fine tuned as far away as Hyderabad, just on its own resources.

and:

What is missing, or not commented on, in much of the discussion round the fake encounters is the fact that this kind of multi-state co ordination of police forces can only be done by Central bodies. The one central body uniquely equipped to bring such co ordinated efforts to fruition is none other than the Intelligence Bureau.

Correct. You know, last month me, Skimpy, Baada, and BJ met up for dinner. We all work in different companies. We live in different parts of Bangalore. We have different job profiles. This kind of multi-company coordination of MBAs cannot be done independently. It must have been done by a central organizing body. The only body capable of doing this is the IIMB Alumni Association. Cellphones and informal networks are a myth.

The truly appalling thing is that this steaming pile of manure got inked from Desipundit. Clearly, being a congenital idiot is no bar to getting link love from Abinandan.

Anyway. I shall now go off and blog about pleasing things. I need to replenish up my bile reserves for when I write about If God Was a Banker.


I Wish…

July 8, 2007

that Chase Manhattan had been acquired by Abbey National instead of JP Morgan. Then the merged entity could have been called Abbey Chase.


Night and Day

July 8, 2007

The Alkaff Bridge by Day:

Alkaff Bridge - II

Same bridge, by night:

Alkaff Bridge at Night

Sigh. It’s opportunities like this that make me wish I had better skills, and better equipment.


Diversity and Inclusion

July 8, 2007

My employers, bless them, are great believers in Diversity and Inclusion. At the global level, they want to make the organisation as diverse as possible on three parameters: gender, nationality, and physical handicap.

In India, the country office decided to focus on gender diversity. Increasing the number of nationalities in India is complex because of visa issues (not to mention that most people of other nationalities would rather not work here), and including physically handicapped people in the organisation requires large investments in infrastructural changes. Bringing women in and making them feel more comfortable is comparatively low hanging fruit.

Except that it screws up diversity on other dimensions, which aren’t being measured.

The thing is, women from smaller towns are much less likely to have the qualifications a woman from a metro does. More to the point, societal norms will act as a barrier to women migrating to metros and taking up jobs there even if they have qualifications. So increasing the gender mix and getting more women into the workplace will actually end up throttling geographical diversity or diversity of personal background.

This isn’t a huge problem if you think gender diversity is far more important than any sort (there are good arguments both for and against such a presumption), but it just illustrates that diversity as an end in itself can end up being self-defeating.


Vibrant Blood

July 7, 2007

Zer Vibrant Blood is zer Vibrant Life

Everybody already bitches that the Singaporean nanny state/ civil society is intrusive, undemocratic, and evil. A poster like this does nothing to contradict that. In fact it makes the Gahmen sound like a bunch of vampires from a B-grade horror flick: “Ah… zer blood… it is so young… so vibrant… so full of life.”

Now that I think about it, if the PAP was actually a coven of vampires, it would explain Singapore’s insanely high taxes on alcohol. They do not want people to drink… vine.


The Times of India’s Firewall Policy

July 6, 2007

Homo (of Homo Fighter, Fighter Homo fame) is currently working as a wage slave for the Slimes of India. Which, considering the stuff it splashes all over its webpage (and print pages), has a rather bizarre firewall policy. As shown by the GTalk excerpt below:

Homo: so what have you done so far to help out a person in dire need?
11:40 AM me: Nothing. I am a heartless bastard who kicks kittens
11:41 AM Homo: very well, but remember that god will one day punish you for your sins, disbelieving blasphemist
11:43 AM and, oh, i realised last week that three weeks is all it’ll take for me to lose my nickname.
11:44 AM me: And why is that?
11:45 AM Homo: courtesy pastor ted haggart.
11:46 AM me: ??
Homo: who sleeps with gay hookers for three years, doped on meth, and then goes in for three weeks of rehab and therapy before proclaiming to the world, “I’m heterosexual now!”
oh you haven’t heard of him? fun story
me: Whatta guy
11:47 AM But your nickname is eternal and independent of sexual orientation
Homo: i’d google it, but my office bans any mention of “sex” in the link, so my search on google news for “ted haggart” +heterosexual will be blocked.
me: Let me get this straight
11:48 AM The Times Of India office bans any searches on sex?
Bwahahhahahahahahahhahahahah!
Homo: yes.
ultimate irony, innit?
me: I am so blogging this
Homo: i’d blog about it, but, ah well, i work for them.
sure!

(In case your firewall isn’t as restrictive, and you do go Googling, it’s Ted Haggard and not Haggart. Here’s the wiki article)


Mark Bagley Should Be Arrested

July 5, 2007

For inciting paedophilia:

usm


Axshully There is a Funda

July 5, 2007

When I wrote my post about Harry Potter being as predictable as mainstream comics, I was being facetious. But some time after that I was thinking about comparing Harry Potter to Star Wars as well. And in the course of wiki-ing about, I came to page on The Hero With a Thousand Faces.

See, there was this dude called Joseph Campbell and he came up with this funda of the monomyth. This funda basically says that every story about a hero follows the same basic pattern – which is set out in great detail over here. So the hero must face a challenge, must have a guiding father figure, must face trials on a journey, and must have a confrontation with another father figure. It’s some sort of story which every proto-culture1 evolves.

When George Lucas wrote Star Wars, he followed the formula as explained by Joseph Campbell to a tee. By doing so, he apparently activated visceral and genetically hardwired triggers within us, which explains why we all watched the movie so often and louwed it so much despite the story being, well, kinda crap.

The problem which subsequently arose was that after George Lucas made his packet, other junta decided that he was on to a good thing and decided that whenever they wrote a screenplay or a book, they’d follow the monomyth template also. This explains why most major movies are very much like each other, and also why Harry Potter is so predictable – or rather why it fails to be truly surprising.

Anyway, figuring out which plot points in the Harry Potter series correspond to which stage of the monomyth is left as an exercise to my beloved readers. I am just going to go ahead and write the next post, after which I shall see a movie. Or read The Writing on the Wall. Or something.

1But not protoculture.